I've never been a big Radiohead fan. I find Thome Yorke to be annoying. To quote Cher in "Clueless" to me Radiohead is nothing more than complaint rock. I became even more suspect of them when they announced their latest opus was going to be released with no price. In Rainbows was only going to be available as a digital download. The buyer got to name their price. Interesting. I've only recently resolved myself to downloading albums. Like any good record freak I need to have the physical packaging in my hot little hands. It's an unnatural obsession. Space limitations have forced me to contain this obsession.
I was reading Slate and I came across an article claiming that some Radiohead fans were upset with the MP3 sound quality of Rainbows. Apparently it's only available 160 kbps MP3 format versus 320 kbps MP3 format of their other albums. Scumbags! They will let you name your price, but they will get over on you with the sound quality. Now, I understand to get worked up over this seems-geeky. The average listener can't really tell the difference especially since they'll either be listening to it on their computer or IPOD. But, here is the kicker. Apparently they plan to physically release the album sometime in early 2008. This is the ultimate fuck you. Radiohead is going to force their fans to go out and pay for what I'm assuming is a sucky record to begin with if they want the better sound quality. NICE. I urge all Radiohead fans to throw away all recordings by this shitty band. Thome Yorke and crew are nothing more than pigs. They just want your money. I WILL NEVER BUY A RADIOHEAD ALBUM. I knew I hated these guys for a reason. Friends don't let friends listen to Radiohead.
jesus chrust the record sounds very good, and it was for free so quit being a shrill bitch about it. my favorite part about your nonsensical rant was when you said
"This is the ultimate fuck you. Radiohead is going to force their fans to go out and pay for what I'm assuming is a sucky record to begin with if they want the better sound quality."
only obsessive compulsive bastards like you would care about a few kbps and have the nerve to go and complain about something that is being handed to you free of charge.
Posted by: Chris Jones | August 30, 2008 at 06:19 PM
jesus chrust the record sounds very good, and it was for free so quit being a shrill bitch about it. my favorite part about your nonsensical rant was when you said
"This is the ultimate fuck you. Radiohead is going to force their fans to go out and pay for what I'm assuming is a sucky record to begin with if they want the better sound quality."
only obsessive compulsive bastards like you would care about a few kbps and have the nerve to go and complain about something that is being handed to you free of charge.
Posted by: Chris Jones | August 30, 2008 at 06:21 PM
jesus chrust the record sounds very good, and it was for free so quit being a shrill bitch about it. my favorite part about your nonsensical rant was when you said
"This is the ultimate fuck you. Radiohead is going to force their fans to go out and pay for what I'm assuming is a sucky record to begin with if they want the better sound quality."
only obsessive compulsive bastards like you would care about a few kbps and have the nerve to go and complain about something that is being handed to you free of charge.
Posted by: Chris Jones | August 30, 2008 at 06:21 PM
Wow, shut up. I live with music and even I can't understand you despizing something so beautiful. You're sad. Keep your mouth shut until you finally understand the full complexities of what music really is.
Posted by: Kelsey | November 11, 2008 at 10:05 AM
I wanna rip out your throat, and lick out your eyeballs you sick fuck! Take your uterus and shove it into the gaping hole in your neck and force you to cough up your lungs as I screw you in the ass with a knife.
Posted by: sad | November 26, 2008 at 11:05 PM
You don't make any sense. Radiohead have offered their album essentially for free at an easily downloadable bit rate. Those obsessive people who need it in full quality can buy the CD if they want to. Everyone wins, apart from you, who wants full quality but doesn't want to pay.
The way music consumption works at the moment is that people who want to own a high quality album, artwork and all, go out and buy it and people who don't illegally download it. It seems to me that you're complaining about the fact that Radiohead have simply made the second part legal. Down with making free, easily accesible music legal! Good one.
Posted by: Bnen | March 24, 2009 at 01:53 PM
Die. now.
Posted by: Every sane person | May 02, 2009 at 11:18 PM
You should probably get that stick out of your ass friend
Posted by: [email protected] | May 28, 2009 at 04:44 PM
When I read your article just now, I was so filled with rage that I immediately searched for a way to comment only to find that others before me have already thoroughly scorned you for your shameful words. I'm satisfied with their comments and feel no need to repeat what they have said. But seriously, fuck you, man.
Posted by: hdee | July 28, 2009 at 03:24 AM
Wow. That was retarded. Not only to you give the lamest reasons on the planet for not liking them ("complaint" music? Seriously?) but you also complain about the fact that they're releasing an album... free of charge. Oh shame on them for not making you pay. You seem to have a very invested interest for a band you supposedly don't like.
Posted by: AntDC | October 30, 2009 at 05:10 AM
Dude, what are you on?
Posted by: NA | January 17, 2010 at 09:45 PM
How could you ever say that radiohead is shitty music? "friends don't let friends listen to radihead." no friends don't let friends read the retarded shit on your blog asshole. your comments are worthless, and you just basjed some of the most fabulously imaginative musicians of all time...for putting out a free album. wow. In Rainbows is absolutely incredible if you haven't already heard it by the way.
Posted by: Ryan Mitchell | May 17, 2010 at 02:19 PM